Sadsad Tamesis Legal and Accountancy Firm

Author name: Juliana Sales

How does an action for recovery of ownership and possession differ from a mere action for recovery of possession? PHOTO: Andrey Popov/GETTY IMAGES

How does an action for recovery of ownership and possession differ from a mere action for recovery of possession? | G.R. No. 269921

Not all cases of encroachment bring the case within the ambit of accion reivindicatoria, as in this case, where recovery of ownership is not sought. Respondent did not even allege that petitioners disputed her title. Hence, there is no reason for the ownership of the property to be conclusively determined through an accion reivindicatoria.

How does an action for recovery of ownership and possession differ from a mere action for recovery of possession? | G.R. No. 269921 Read More »

Is a Buyer Protected as an Innocent Purchaser for Value if the Seller Is Not the True Owner? PHOTO: Towfiqu Barbhhuiya

Is a Property Buyer Protected as an Innocent Purchaser for Value if the Seller Is Not the True Owner? | G.R. No. 259051

Generally, to be considered an innocent purchaser for value, the buyer does not have any notice of defect or irregularity as to the right or interest of the seller, and the buyer is without notice that a third party has a claim to the subject property.

Is a Property Buyer Protected as an Innocent Purchaser for Value if the Seller Is Not the True Owner? | G.R. No. 259051 Read More »

PNR Train. PHOTO: Coconuts Manila

Is the Philippine National Railways Liable for Negligence in Railroad Crossing Accidents? | G.R. No. 157658

When tragedy strikes at a railroad crossing, who bears the burden of responsibility—the vehicle driver or the railway company? This case tackles PNR’s liability for negligence in ensuring public safety at crossings, despite the train’s right-of-way.

Is the Philippine National Railways Liable for Negligence in Railroad Crossing Accidents? | G.R. No. 157658 Read More »

Court Gavel. PHOTO: Tingey Injury Law Firm/UNSPLASH

Musings on the Law: The Concept of Prescription and the Cases of Corpuz, Jr., Desierto, and Consebido

In any legal battle, time is always of the essence. Thus, it is a lawyer’s duty to diligently and seasonably act on any legal matter entrusted by his clients, and he shall not cause or occasion delay in any legal matter before any court, tribunal, or other agency. These duties are codified not only because of the client’s right and desire to obtain speedy justice, but also due to the lapse of a certain period provided by the law, which results in a loss or waiver of the right to prosecute cases. The latter instance is called prescription.

Musings on the Law: The Concept of Prescription and the Cases of Corpuz, Jr., Desierto, and Consebido Read More »

https://157.245.54.109/ https://128.199.163.73/ https://cadizguru.com/ https://167.71.213.43/
Scroll to Top